Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Economic and Glacial Meltdown 2009


Global warming is draining our economy

We have already lost billions because of climate change. According to a University of Maryland study, costs already accrued include:

  • -----$1.3 billion – the amount of damage associated with crop loss as a result of Georgia’s drought in 2007
  • -----$300 million – reconstruction costs for the damage caused to rail transportation by Hurricane Katrina
  • -----$272 million – insured catastrophic losses in 2007, as a result of increasing flood damage.

  • The cost is projected to be far greater. The total cost of global warming will be 3.6 percent of GDP if present trends continue, according to a report from Tufts University.
  • Four global warming impacts alone – hurricane damage, real estate losses, energy costs, and water costs – will come with a price tag of 1.8 percent of U.S. GDP, or almost $1.9 trillion annually (in today's dollars) by 2100, according to the same study.
  • Losses will be massive to state economies. The impact of global warming on three sectors – tourism, electric utilities and real estate – together with hurricane damage would shrink Florida’s GDP by more than 5 percent by the end of the century, according to another report from Tufts University.

Waiting to act will only cost us more
  • Delaying just two years will require twice the effort. An analysis of 2008 climate legislation shows that waiting just two years to tackle global warming would require more than double the annual cuts in emissions to achieve the same cumulative goal – 4.3 percent in annual cuts versus 2 percent.

  • We should not delay investment and job creation. Companies are waiting for new rules before they invest billions in new power plants and other projects. A cap is necessary to unfreeze this investment. A cap will also create new manufacturing jobs, like making steel for wind turbines. See our online map, featuring 1,200 green jobs in key manufacturing states.

Damage from global warming grows more deadly

Science shows that climate measures are needed now more than ever.
  • Massive hurricanes. Warming ocean temperatures are unleashing violent hurricanes, reaching new levels of intensity and aggression previously unseen. A landmark MIT study in 2005 confirmed that hurricane intensity has doubled over the last 30 years. Since that study, no fewer than 16 other studies have supported the link between global warming and hurricane intensity, illustrating a growing and grave threat to humanity.

  • Increasing drought. Higher temperatures are evaporating water at a rapid pace, putting water supplies, livestock and crops in danger. Severe drought conditions began damaging wide swaths of North America, southern Europe and southern and central Asia at the turn of the century and in 2004, the Western U.S. experienced the most severe drought in 80 years and one of the most severe in 500 years.

  • More frequent and severe wildfires. As the climate warms, hot, dry summers are creating tinderbox conditions ideal for wildfires. “Since 1986,” Steven W. Running reported in Science magazine in August 2006, “longer, warmer summers have resulted in a fourfold increase of major [U.S.] wildfires and a sixfold increase in the area of forest burned, compared to the period from 1970 to 1986.”

  • Accelerated flooding and coastal erosion. Rising sea levels, caused by global warming, not only flood the land but also erode more coastline with higher ocean waves, threatening coastal populations and habitats. Over the 20th century, the seas rose between four and eight inches – ten times the average rate of the last 3,000 years. If sea level continues to rise, thousands of square miles of land in densely populated areas such as the eastern U.S. may be lost in a century or two.

Cutting emissions is a bargain

The cost of a carbon cap to American families and the U.S. GDP is almost too small to calculate, finds our comprehensive analysis of economic models.
  • In present-value terms, the median projected impact of climate policy is less than one-half of one percent of U.S. GDP for the period 2010-2030, and under three-quarters of one percent through the middle of the century.

  • In the year 2030, the U.S. economy is projected to be nearly double today’s size. The median forecast cost to the U.S. economy of capping greenhouse gas emissions is only 0.58 percent, according to an EDF study.

  • The overall cost of capping greenhouse gases for the average American family will amount to 1 percent or less of household budgets over the next two decades.
Read the analyses and reports on the website of the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF).

Or, Read On . . .


Climate action obstructionists (oil/gas/coal lobbyists' elected stooges) are trying to halt climate legislation by tacking on 450 worthless amendments to the Climate Legislation currently in the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

With amendments like these, even environment-friendly legislators would have a hard time voting for the bill:
  • 50 amendments to allow each of the 50 states to opt out of the pollution reduction requirements.

  • 50 amendments to allow utilities from each state to avoid paying for global warming pollution credits.

  • amendment calling for review of the tax status of the Environmental Defense Fund.

  • amendments to eliminate all the tax benefits for businesses involved in the United States Climate Action Partnership (USCAP).

  • amendment to use Presidio, part of San Francisco's Golden Gate National Recreation Area, as a national storage site for sequestered carbon dioxide.

  • amendment to turn Nevada's Yucca Mountain into a carbon dioxide storage site.
Please donate whatever amount you can to the Environmental Defense Fund, so that they may run new TV, print and online ads, go door-to-door to increase visibility in key Congressional Districts and get the message out in the blogosphere.



Stop the economic and glacial meltdown
before it is too late.


We will make history in 2009. Whether this is the year we change America's energy policy direction or the year in which we lose an opportunity to act is up to us. Please take action!



Photograph Credits: Global Warming Art

McCarty Glacier - July 7th, 1909 by Ulysses Sherman Grant, USGS photo library, public domain. August 11, 2004 by Bruce F. Molnia, USGS, public domain

Bear Glacier - 1920: Photograph by unknown photographer in the collection of the National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology. Public domain by virtue of age. 2005: Photograph by Bruce F. Molnia of the USGS, in the collection of the National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology. Public domain as a work of the US government.

Northwestern Glacier - July 27, 1909: Photograph by Ulysses S. Grant in the collection of the National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology. Public domain by virtue of age. 2005: Photograph by Bruce F. Molnia of the USGS, in the collection of the National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology. Public domain as a work of the US government.

Muir and Riggs Glaciers - August 13th, 1941 by William O. Field, National Snow and Ice Data Center, may be used freely if properly cited. August 31, 2004 by Bruce F. Molnia, USGS, public domain,

Pedersen Glacier - 1920: Photograph by unknown photographer in the collection of the National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology. Public domain by virtue of age. August 8th, 2005: Photograph by Bruce F. Molnia of the USGS, in the collection of the National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology. Public domain as a work of the US government.

Monday, May 18, 2009

Stop delivery of 540M directories per year

Yellowpagesgoesgreen.org is helping municipalities and local governments around the country establish ordinances to mandate that Yellow Pages and White Pages only be delivered to home and offices that ask for them.

Municipalities and local government that provide trash services are extremely concerned about the landfill cost and why they have to absorb the cost of handling the telephone directories.

1.) Local governments are looking to establish an Ordinance of $5 per book to the telephone companies for the delivery of unwanted books that end up in the trash and take up valuable landfills.

2.) An alternative Ordinance being looked at is to require the telephone book to be delivered in a plastic bag and the directory company has to come back the following week to pick up the old book that has been placed in the reusable bag.

3.) Building and Property owners are banning the bulk delivery of Yellow and White Pages to their facilities. They are tired of having to handle the books and the cost associated with the ones left over and old books that end up in their trash dumps.

4.) Some Cities and Towns are looking to stop the delivery of Yellow and White Pages books and are using their litter laws as the tools to enforce their efforts.

Yellowpagesgoesgreen.org asks the question: “Why do we get three to four pounds of paper dropped on our front door four to six times per year by various telephone directory companies and how are we supposed to dispose of them?”

Stop the nonsense and the cost placed on the consumer. If we want a book we will request one. If we do not want a book delivered, stop delivering them! The organization will contact the local telephone company and provide them with your name and address and tell them to stop the delivery. This service costs zero. thing.

Take action: Go to http://www.yellowpagesgoesgreen.org/stop-yellow-pages/, complete the short form, then confirm that you do want to opt-out of delivery by clicking the confirmation link in the email sent to you. Quick, easy and definitely a good cause

Friday, May 15, 2009

STOP Oil and Gas Drilling in Alaska

In testimony to the House Committee on Natural Resources, big oil (Shell, ExxonMobil and Chevron) made it clear that Alaska is still a major target for drilling.

In an area already feeling the impact of climate change, more drilling will mean additional pollution in the form of oil spills, airborne contaminants, and waste products like drilling fluids and metal cuttings.

This interest in drilling for oil threatens marine life and will add more acidifying carbon dioxide to the oceans. For more information about what this acidity is doing to the ocean, please read Oceans are Becoming More Acidic.



We have heard the rhetoric: drilling in the Arctic will reduce gas prices, oil development is safe, how the 1002 area is devoid of life, how drilling for oil is a national security issue . . .


Myths vs. Facts

Myth: Opening the ANWR to oil drilling will bring down prices at the pump.
Fact: Opening the Refuge to drilling would not lower today's prices.

According to a May 2008 report by the Energy Information Administration (PDF), opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge today would result in Americans saving a few pennies per gallon, ten years from now.


Myth: Oil development does not harm the environment or people.
Fact: Oil drilling would harm the land, animals, and people of the Refuge.

The National Academy of Sciences reported that cumulative impacts of oil activities harmed the land, animals, Alaska Native culture, and wilderness. Visit the NAS and read the report online.


Myth: The Coastal Plain "1002 Area" is a desolate landscape with virtually no wildlife.
Fact: The Coastal Plain "1002 Area" is the biological heart of the Refuge.

Oil companies want to drill the 1.5 million-acre coastal plain (1002 Area) of AWNR, which scientists say is the very heart of ANWR.

Right Click to Open Larger Map in Another Tab or Window

Myth: Oil drilling will have a minimal footprint on the coastal plain "1002 Area" of the Refuge.
Fact: Drilling on the coastal plain "1002 Area" will leave a permanent network of sprawling industrial sites.

Nearly the entire North Slope is currently exploited. We must save the last five percent. See map below.

Right Click to Open Larger Map in Another Tab or Window

Myth: Drilling in the Refuge will help secure America's energy future.
Fact: Drilling for oil in America's Arctic will not break our oil addiction.

The U.S. needs to lead the world in new, clean, renewable energy solutions. Drilling is good only for the oil and gas companies and very bad for the Earth and its creatures.

What can you do?

Take Action: Visit Chill The Drills and send an email that asks for strong protections for the special places in America.

Take Action: Donate to Oceana Advocacy Resources (OAR).

Take Action: Educate your friends from either website.


Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Endangered Spaces : Pacific Trash Gyre

Join Small Rivers ("content that flips") and start your river flowing.





Join the connect2earth community

Launched in March 2008, connect2earth is a World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) initiative sponsored by Nokia. Join the connect2earth community. Connect with others by posting text, images, audio or video and then follow the discussion as it continues on the web or your mobile phone.




Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Wolves Targeted Again

Protections for Wolves Removed

Wolves in Idaho, Montana, eastern portions of Oregon and Washington and northern Utah were delisted, thus losing federal protection under the Endangered Species Act. More than two thirds of the current population may be killed.

This Bush administration rule was given the green light by Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar without any consultation with conservationists, congressional leaders, or scientists outside the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Right now, the Defenders of Wildlife have a legal team preparing an emergency challenge to the delisting to help save these wolves. If you can donate to this cause, please do so on the Defenders of Wildlife website. Any amount will help.



Meanwhile, in Alaska:

It is the end of a bloody aerial gunning season that killed more than 250 wolves. However, the Palin administration has indicated that it will continue to kill wolves through other means.
Let me see, she posted a bounty on forelegs, killed their cubs, poisoned their dens . . . maybe wolf furs and wolf cub rugs are next?

No Mother's Day for Polar Bears

are polar bears doomed?Are Polar Bears Doomed?
I am just sick about this. Please take action.

The opportunity granted by Congress for Secretary of the Interior Salazar to revoke the Bush extinction plan with the stroke of a pen has passed. Salazar's decision to keep the Bush rule is a terrible blow to polar bears and the future of their Arctic habitat. Salazar said that the Endangered Species Act is not the appropriate tool for us to deal with a global issue! Evidently, President Obama agrees.

Scientists warn that global warming could threaten one-third of the world's plant and vertebrate animal species with extinction by 2050. If the Endangered Species Act is not the proper tool for saving the polar bears, then what is? It is crucial that comprehensive global warming legislation include dedicated policies and funding to ensure wildlife can survive.

Click here to send a message to your representative through the Defenders of Wildlife website and let them know that the lives of the polar bears (and all the other endangered species) matter to you--more than oil and gas, more than dividing up the Arctic, more than bailing out crooks and their companies . . .


Monday, May 11, 2009

Music Monday : The Earth Song




Omni Trio playing the Earth Song

The Music Monday meme has many participants. I decided to join in from Endangered Spaces this week.
Happy Mother's Day to the Earth

Visit Lady Java's Lounge for more information. Just click the Music Monday banner.



Friday, May 08, 2009

Reduce Carbon Footprint by Carbon Offsets

carbonadvicegroup
Visit the CarbonAdviceGroup.com to calculate your carbon footprint, to learn how you may reduce your carbon footprint, and to purchase offset credits.

Below are a few of the latest projects that are financed with the funds that purchase carbon offsets.


Green Lights New Orleans
Location: New Orleans, USA Type: Community Project

The goal of the Green Lights New Orleans project is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions throughout the city by replacing 3 million light bulbs with more efficient, low energy light bulbs, thus avoiding 18,000 million tonnes of emissions over the lifetime of the programme – this roughly equates to taking 120,000 cars off the road for a whole year. Low energy bulbs use 75% less energy than regular light bulbs. By replacing all the bulbs in a house (around 30 bulbs on average) over $650 can be saved over the lifetime of the new bulbs for some of the city’s most impoverished inhabitants.


Greenville County Methane Capture
Location: South Carolina, USA Type: Methane Capture

This project is a landfill gas collection and utilization project located at the Enoree landfill in Greer, South Carolina, USA. It will initially flare the landfill gas, but it will ultimately use the gas to generate renewable electricity. The objective of the project is to install an active gas collection and utilization system that will convert the methane content of the landfill gases, thereby reducing its global warming impact.


Intrepid Dairy Farm Methane Capture
Location: Southern Idaho, USA Type: Methane Capture

The Whitesides and Westpoint dairy farms, located in southern Idaho, USA, are changing their method of processing manure to a system using anaerobic digestion. Anaerobic digestion technology will help reduce the release of methane into the atmosphere and aid in mitigating climate change. The new biogas digesters installed at both dairies will now capture and destroy methane gas produced from the waste of over 12,000 dairy cows.